Informal bonuses for teachers

Show your gratitude – I’m marking your work

Posted in education, Humour | Tagged | Leave a comment

A Chinese jobs creation programme

In a story beloved by economists it’s said that Milton Friedman* was once visiting China when he was shocked to see that, instead of modern tractors and earth movers, thousands of workers were toiling away building a canal with shovels. He asked his host, a government bureaucrat, why more machines weren’t being used. The bureaucrat replied, “You don’t understand. This is a jobs program.” To which Milton responded, “Oh, I thought you were trying to build a canal. If it’s jobs you want, you should give these workers spoons, not shovels!”

* Milton Friedman is a Nobel winning economist


Posted in Economics, Politics, quips | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hedonism and the state’s interference in the lives of adults

Hedonists believe ‘the pursuit of pleasure is the most important goal of human life’. Hedonists are tolerant. Each person’s pleasurable activities is theirs. Hedonists don’t recognise any role for states in legislating the personal conduct of adults. The only caveat is taking pleasure from inflicting pain on non-consenting adults. These activities are entirely unacceptable. Hedonists accept state enforced limitations in this regard, likewise protecting minors. Hedonists demand freedom for adults qua adults to knowingly make personal decisions which promote their pleasure, regardless of the style of activities involved. Two state interferences are identified and discussed below.

Religious authoritarianism has informed legislation for generations (see addendum).Much of that legalisation prevailed into the post-religious period. The ultimate premise that the state has a right to interfere is generally uncontentious. This is astonishing. The zeitgeist of the 1960s smoothed the path for the legalisation of homosexuality. In 1966 homosexual activities were illegal. Two years later homosexuality was perfectly legal (subject to laws protecting minors).1 Egregious prosecutions have subsequently been subject to very public apologies.2 The arbitrary use of public policy to victimise pleasurable activities as an exercise of power is undemocratic, but at least the state didn’t profit from criminalising homosexuality.

Feeble justifications are offered for criminalising some drug use. Usually the justifications run along the lines that legalisation is required as a ‘protective’ measure. Hedonists find this incomprehensible. Adults are infantilised by the premise that they need protecting from themselves! Worse, the state ensures that harmful drugs are legalised for commercial reasons3whilstothers are criminalised. Commercially available addictive drugs are heavily regulated and taxed. The state profits from addictive drug use. The hypocrisy is stunning.

Addictive drugs are very lucrative as every criminal knows. Hedonists shudder at the insanity of British drug laws. The state reaps a huge income from drugs.4 The state profits from drug related deaths which wouldn’t happen with quality control and regulation. Meanwhile criminalised drugs cost the state extraordinary amounts of money.5 Smashing lives and paying out hundreds of millions of pounds in direct costs so the state can interfere in the pleasures of a citizen is insanity. When a Conservative Justice Secretary6 admitted using cocaine ‘several times’ this point is triple underlined. A wealthy, middle-aged, white man admits to criminal behaviour, remains untouched by the law and keeps his job as a cabinet minister. This is class war at its worst as working-class drug users are hunted down. They fill prisons with their lives in ruins. Not only their lives. The lives of their loved ones are also severely damaged.

Hedonism isn’t degeneracy. Seeking pleasurable activities is normal. What’s abnormal are state approved lists of pleasurable activities. States should withdraw from every attempt at moderating private behaviour so long as they aren’t vicious or harmful to others.

Addendum The Blasphemy Act, 1650, was the ultimate state interference in the 17th century: God’s relationship with man and therefore eternal life wasn’t repealed until 1967 by the great reforming government of Harold Wilson. See



3 Tobacco and alcohol are notoriously lethal. The latter also causes huge social damage in addition to personal harm. Respectively there are two very important companies on the FTSE. They’re British American Tobacco valued at £67.55 billion and Diageo valued at £77.87 billion. (Correct on 27th September 2019). Both of these companies are, in essence, drug dealers.

4 £10.7bn in tax revenue from alcohol for example

and £9.3bn from tobacco




Posted in Philosophy, Politics | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The benefits of private health care

A lawyer woke up after surgery and asked, “Why are all the blinds drawn?”

“There’s a fire across the street, and we didn’t want you to think you’d died.”


Posted in Health, Humour | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Book Review: Garrison Keillor ~ Lake Woebegon Days (1985)

Garrison is a radio star in the mid-West of the USA. His show is a slow conversational series of supposed memories. He speaks in a drawling and yet compelling voice and once hooked…. If you’ve heard his voice then the stories have a wonderful intimacy. He draws you into his world and you share the laid back passions of life in a dull-as-ditchwater town where nothing happens.

Nothing happens except that something is always happening. Lake Woebegon Days is the antidote of 24 ‘News’. Time is measured in decades where nothing is forgotten. Incidents on the sports field are etched in memory and school experiences are vivid years later. Passions are roused by very conservative views on religion with heated, but icily polite, debates. Every denomination is represented and each one is a ghetto of prejudice. Garrison’s satire keeps it kind, loving and wonderful. The quotation is about religious identity:-

Our Lake Woebegon bunch was part of the Sanctified Brethren branch known as the Cox Brethren, which was one of a number of ‘exclusive’ Brethren branches- that is, to non-Coxians, we were known as ‘Cox Brethren’; to ourselves, we were simply The Brethren, the last remnant of the true Church. Our name came from Brother Cox who was kicked out of the Johnson Brethren in 1932- for preaching the truth! p106

Posted in Humour, Literature, Religion, Review | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Incredible sky scene

Nature as art

Richard M.

Posted in photography | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Len Deighton on Etonians

Eton, Oxbridge, Buddha class: sadistic, self-sufficient apparatchiks who controlled Whitehall by stealth, wealth and consanguinity and — no matter how friendly — inevitably closed ranks against intruders like me.

Len Deighton. Hope (1995) (Kindle Locations 1945-1947). HarperCollins UK.


Posted in education, Literature, Politics, School | Tagged , | Leave a comment