A Hospital Bed Conversation

An Englishman & an Irishman are in the hospital laid side by side in beds. The Englishman looks over at the Irishman and peels away his oxygen mask from his face.

“I’m English…” Said the Englishman.

The Irishman also takes away his mask and gasps, “Irish…”

The Englishman slowly replies, “My name’s David…”

“Paddy…” Replies the Irishman.

“Cancer…” Says the Englishman pointing to his chest.

The Irishman who slowly turns his head and lifts away his oxygen mask replies,



Posted in Humour | Tagged , | Leave a comment

This I Know

It wasn’t ordinary working people
Who caused the 80s banking crisis
It wasn’t them that caused financial meltdown
No! It was greedy bankers
Who caused Northern Rock to fall
The rich. Many politicians were the root cause
Those with mansions
And ‘off-shore’ stashed millions
Content to see the poor suffer.

What do they care, about austerity
Deprivation, hunger and blight?
Poverty for children – well that’s alright
Let the free market grow.
They’re alright, they made it so.
Bring on austerity, let the poor suffer
All those nasty Labour want
Is charity. Free rides or hand-outs
Food banks are just the poor
Demonstrating their incompetence.

Hard Left’ isn’t surprising.
Riot and revolution has grown
Over years of pay restrictions
The sick and disabled are labelled fit for work
Stigmatised, as burdens on the state
Vilified, as begging spongers.
When Mothers can’t feed their young
Men made to feel ashamed, at lack of work
Whole communities, left with no where to go
This I know – this I know.


Posted in Economics, Poetry, Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Book Review: Adam Kay~ This is Going to Hurt: Secret Diaries of a Junior Doctor

Expectations are heightened when secret and diaries are juxtaposed. Samuel Pepys partially wrote his in code and James Boswell’s revelations were fiercely guarded for very good reasons. Neither of those diaries were published during their lifetimes so they really were ‘secret’. But Adam Kay is very much alive. So what are Kay’s secret diaries up to?

Kay had a stellar career as a doctor and was clearly destined for a consultancy until his career was brought to a grinding halt by a professional tragedy. The narrative arc shows a man driven by dedication and humanity. Promotions come at a steady pace and always to the benefit of both patients and colleagues. He’s erudite (and does flaunt it a bit) and very witty but anyone reading this book solely for a laugh is going to be disappointed. It’s far more than that. Operating theatres, with all the drama that accompanies them, are profusely described; as is the relentless pressure of being constantly on a ‘bleeper’. Exhaustion, critical professional decision-making and managing colleagues is the everyday world of a senior junior doctor. Witty yes, but so very much more.

Why you should read this book: It is erudite, humane and very witty.

Why you shouldn’t read this book: You’re expecting your first child.

A keenly priced hardback is at https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_fb_2_8?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=adam+kay&sprefix=adam+kay%2Caps%2C158&crid=ID2RTNWR8W7T


Posted in Health, Literature, Review | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

University of California: Berkeley 2017

Stakhanovite Lecturers at Berkeley

There are 1098 students enrolled on CS61A at Berkeley who are happily sharing a learning experience in the Wheeler Hall, which is Berkeley’s largest lecture hall. In state students pay $34,972 and out-of-state students pay $61,654. Is this a demonstration but bigger is worse?



Posted in Economics, Finance, School | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Conservation: Is it worth it?

A confident nation builds so that future people may look back and marvel at their ancestors ingenuity and aesthetic vision. A nation in decline looks to the past in a vain attempt to “preserve” what was once great. Preservation is what you do to dead butterflies.

Ironically, if today’s rules for historical preservation had been in place in the past the buildings that some now want to preserve would never have been built at all. The opportunity cost of preservation is future greatness.




Posted in History | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

The price of naivety: Verdun 1916

The slow moving Front Line at Verdun 1916

The Bismarckian precept that two-front wars are disastrous shaped his foreign policy. He created a gigantic balance-of-power, which kept European peace from the formation of Germany in 1871 until 1914. Needless to relate 43 years of peace wasn’t a blessing for career soldiers. Those 43 years of peace meant the German general staff had no practical experience of warfare. Their experience was war games. The Schlieffen Plan, 1905, is an elegant war game masquerading as a viable battle plan. The outcome of this plan vindicated Bismarckian thinking. Novice generals, in this case Falkenhayn, obstinately resisted the actuality of real warfare. Verdun was a needless catastrophe.

Erich von Falkenhayn had an insignificant role in the Chinese Boxer Rebellion learning no useful lessons for European warfare. Unfortunately for the 1914 German army he was their Commander-in-Chief. No German officer was better equipped than Falkenhayn for that role. They were all novices. War games were their forte and the outcome was that the German high command was intellectually crippled. They were dominated by group think and subservience to hierarchies.

Falkenhayn orchestrated the modified 1914 Schlieffen Plan attack on France. This attack relied on the Belgium army being unresisting, which they weren’t; and the Russians taking two months or so mobilising, which they didn’t. He was also a victim of competing influences from Hindenburg who siphoned troops to strengthen the eastern front. Falkenhayn believed that war could be time-tabled. The Schlieffen Plan had to be modified to take account of an active eastern front: modified for the worst. By October 1914 the die was cast for the next four years. Meanwhile very experienced French generals remained focused on the cavalry, which they imagined would sweep through gaps created by the infantry: they were culpably delusional. All the generals had had opportunities to learn about real warfare by 1916: none of them took it.

Falkenhayn believed he’d found the Achilles heel of the French at Verdun. Verdun had psychological significance for the French and, he reasoned, they wouldn’t make a tactical withdrawal whatever the circumstances. Verdun was designed as a battle of attrition. Falkenhayn intended to ‘bleed France white’ by sucking in all their reserves to the point that they would have to call for peace. He didn’t plan a ten month attritional battle. Instead he was ‘captured’ by the logic of the situation. Verdun was a chaotic desperate nihilistic battle driven by its own momentum, an out of control juggernaut, as it were.

Bismarckian strategic thinking factored in ‘known unknowns’. Falkenhayn’s naivety was untouched by two years of catastrophic warfare. He correctly identified Verdun’s iconic status but didn’t appreciate the depth of French patriotism. Worse: Falkenhayn ignored the Russians. The Brusilov Offensive was surprisingly successful reducing transfers of troops from east to west. Falkenhayn’s dream ended when Haig initiated the battle on the Somme opening a significant ‘second’ front. The battle of the Somme lasted four and a half months and obliterated the possibility of a successful outcome at Verdun*. Falkenhayn was intellectually paralysed and Verdun continued until the 18th December 1916 five and half months after the Somme attacks began.

The German high command relied on brute force at key moments in the war. They didn’t have the intellectual flexibility to recalibrate once things didn’t go to plan. If artillery bombardment, poison gas and mass attacks failed- and they all did- their decision was to repeat. The classic failure was the battle of Verdun. None of the surprises that hit Falkenhayn were actually very surprising. During the ten months of Verdun the German generals wanted to do something- anything. The tragic carnage that ensued was the price of naivety.

*German casualties at Verdun totalled c. 500,000: French casualties c. 400,000. In other words the exact opposite of Falkenhayn’s intention, namely to bleed France white.

Verdun’s grim statistics were more-or-less matched, in half the time, at the Somme. UK/ French casualties c.434,000 and the Germans c.500,000. The Somme wasn’t a side-show meant to divert German forces it was a very significant battle in its own right. Falkenhayn’s war of attrition ground down his army. Tangentially it also was part of the provocation of the French mutinies in 1917.

Posted in History, War | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fun Loving Baby


Posted in Humour | Tagged , | Leave a comment