How Wars Are Won

Conventional war is more-or-less equal armies slugging it out. The paradigm is the First World War. This ended when Germany was outnumbered with the entry of the USA. The European Second World War ended with Germany outnumbered once more. Japan drew their conventional war in 1945 but lost to technological innovations. The world’s final conventional war, Korea 1950-53, was drawn. The current Russia-Ukraine war is a hybrid with technology beginning to dominate. It will probably end in a draw, unless Russia is bled dry by Ukraine’s allies.

Leadership

 “You are not able to go out against this Philistine and fight him; you are only a young man, and he has been a warrior from his youth.” 1 Samuel 17:33 The David and Goliath Biblical story.

Saul’s decision allowing David to fight Goliath was existential. If David lost, Saul’s army became slaves. David’s intervention was transformative. Goliath was supreme in hand-to-hand battle but couldn’t reach David who fought from a distance. Saul was a great leader because he recognised that a conventional battle would end in defeat and therefore he used unconventional methods.

Innovation

The Vietnam wars began in the 1940s against the French, who they defeated, and later, against America. One innovation of Vietnamese generals was underground warfare in the Cu Chi1 tunnels. Very narrow, extensive and booby-trapped, they were extremely difficult to counter-attack. Guerrilla attacks continuously surprised and demoralised the Americans.

Their other principal innovation was supply routes through Laotian jungles.2 The Americans attacked those routes with saturation bombing. These attacks were war crimes, costing international support because Laos was neutral.

Technological Advances

By 1945, the Japanese were defeated. America controlled the skies and Japan’s armies were stretched across Asia and the Pacific islands. The battle of Iwo Jima,3 17th February-26th March 1945, persuaded president Truman the human cost of invading Japan was too high. He authorised atomic weapons. ‘A’ bombs indiscriminately slaughtered tens of thousands of civilians and so this was a war crime. The obliteration of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, August 1945, ended the war. The Japanese didn’t lose a conventional war, which makes this the first draw of the new era.

Partisan warfare

Germany conquered the European part of the Soviet Union in 1941 but it remained  unsubdued. The Soviets undertook two forms of asymmetric warfare.4 Firstly, they used scorched earth where anything usable was destroyed. Secondly, partisans battled ferociously behind Germany’s frontline. Other conquered countries did likewise but less successfully.5

Philosophy6

Clausewitz said,

  ‘Military genius’ is not simply a matter of intellect, but a combination of qualities of intellect, experience, personality, and temperament (and there are many possible such combinations) that create a very highly developed mental aptitude for the waging of war.6

Philosophy places war within a holistic context considering the principal objectives of why diplomacy has failed. Famously Clausewitz said, “…we claim that war is nothing more than a continuation of the political process by applying other means.” This is precisely what didn’t happen prior to the First World War. Politicians discussed the reason for the war after it ended. Woodrow Wilson’s so-called 14 Points appearing from nowhere gave shape to the peace treaties.7 Likewise Israel. Generals dictate policy and have given Israel a siege mentality as they are surrounded by walls. Israeli generals shape political policy believing Israel will be permanently besieged. This negates Clausewitz’s insight.

Conclusion

Games of chess should end in draws as both players know the moves and everything is in clear view. Technological wars are like chess games rendering events, like the Charge of the Light Brigade, redundant. The primacy of technology has been evident for some time but the use of drones in the Russia-Ukraine war is instructive. Wars aren’t won on battlefields. Technology wins wars and innovation is everything. Battlefields are a quaint historical memory, like medieval sieges.

Notes

1 Củ Chi tunnels – Wikipedia

2 Laos during the Vietnam War (alphahistory.com)

3 Battle of Iwo Jima – Wikipedia

4 1) Scorched earth – Wikipedia  2)  Soviet partisans – Wikipedia

5 French Resistance – Wikipedia

6 Carl von Clausewitz – Wikipedia  He recognised the mobilisation of civilian populations into guerrilla units for example.

7 Fourteen Points – Wikipedia This was much to the surprise of the principal European leaders but they managed to water Wilson’s theories down – especially in regard to their imperial possessions.

Posted in History, Philosophy, Technology, War | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Messi’s psychological warfare

Alessandro Nesta on Messi:

“I kicked him and fell down, exhausted. He immediately gave me his hand to lift me up. Do you understand? I was on the ground and 2 seconds later, I opened my eyes and saw him with his hand out to help me up. There Messi destroyed me mentally.”

Note

Nesta,  “…as a centre-back, he is widely considered one of the best defenders of all time.” Alessandro Nesta – Wikipedia

Posted in Sport | Tagged , | Leave a comment

It was tough in my day

Posted in Humour, Sport | Tagged | Leave a comment

How New Zealanders amuse themselves

“The first sausage arrived in my letterbox in the summer of 2022,” Jacob Coetzee told reporters in Surfdale, on Auckland’s Waiheke Island, “wrapped in white buttered bread, coated in tomato sauce, and looking as if it had been barbecued. I shrugged it off as a leftover from a drunken passer-by, until it happened again, and again. Same sausage, same sauce, same location, so I sent a picture to my friend group, and some of them had been sausaged too. That’s when we realised we had a serial sausager on the island.”

 Funny Old World ~ Private Eye 21st April 2023 p26

Posted in cookery, Humour | Tagged , | Leave a comment

An anatomy class for veterinary students

First-year students were attending a class on a cow. The professor began his lecture, “Vet’s need two important qualities. Firstly, they shouldn’t be disgusted by anything involving an animal’s body.”

The professor stuck his finger in the cow’s anus, withdrew it, and sucked his finger. “Go ahead!” The students freaked out. They hesitated, but bravely took turns sticking a finger in the cow’s anus and sucking it.

When they’d finished, the professor continued, “Secondly, accurate observation is essential. I stuck my middle finger in the cow and sucked my index finger. Pay attention.”

Posted in education, Humour, Science | Tagged | Leave a comment

Film Review: Oppenheimer (2023) (Cillian Murphy and Robert Downey jr)

At three hours long I nearly avoided this film. A grave error of judgement. Three hours flew past leaving me with a warm sense of privilege. Why? I felt that I’d been part of something, which was out of the ordinary.

Instead of being straightforward biopic it was a ‘biography’ of a unique historical moment. A moment when geopolitics changed and war entered an entirely new phase. Secondly, Oppenheimer wasn’t a boring unidimensional geek.

He was brilliant on a different plane to everyone else and with an insatiable desire to learn. He was a serial womaniser. And had a profound social conscience, which involved flirting with the USA’s communist party. He also supported the 1930s Spanish Republicans in their desperate fight for survival against Franco.

Unamazingly, lesser mortals (which was just about everyone else) either worshipped or loathed him. This is where the wonderful performance of Robert Downey comes in. Slimy and treacherous, Lewis Strauss (Downey), tried to wreck Oppenheimer’s post-war career. But he in turn was wrecked by Oppenheimer’s supporters who ruined his chance of becoming a cabinet member in the 1950s.

So, two biopics, a history lesson, and absolutely wonderful insights done by a master director in Christopher Nolan and the great Cillian Murphy as Oppenheimer.

 Note

This quote is from a previous blog,

“The all-American upper-class Jew, Robert Oppenheimer, who was a world-class physicist, rose in the academic world because of sheer genius. The chair of his department was Raymond Birge. When Oppenheimer tried to appoint Robert Serber, an outstanding physicist, Birge said, “One Jew in the department is enough”

The Evian Conference and Kristallnacht, 1938 | Odeboyz’s Blog (oedeboyz.com)

Posted in Film, History, Politics, Review | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reassurance!

Posted in Humour, Travel | Tagged | Leave a comment

Book Review: Sue Townsend ~ Adrian Mole: The prostate years (2009)

Sue Townsend’s character Adrian Mole is a masterclass in English humour. Ever since she introduced us to The secret diary of Adrian Mole aged 133/4 the character has developed. The nerdy, geeky, unworldly, kindly and hapless Adrian continuously drifts towards the rocks of life. Everything he touches has is negative Midas but nonetheless he remains positive with his dreams intact.

In this book Adrian is 39 when he realises he’s ill. A series of comic failures to get an all-important doctor’s appointment ends with him by-passing the system. The hospital diagnoses prostate cancer. Sue’s brutally witty writing draws out the humour. This is a terrific book.

Try this:

(Rosie is his daughter and has become a Goth.)

“I have prayed to our goth God to make you well again.”

I asked her if her God was a compassionate sort.

She said, ‘Not always. When a goth dies, God laughs. But you’re a human, Aidy, he’ll look after you.” p162

Posted in Health, Humour, Literature, Review | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Brian Clough’s advice to Trevor Francis

Brian Clough: “Trevor, when you get the ball, son, pass it to John Robertson”

Trevor Francis (Britain’s first £1 million signing): ”Why?”

Brian Clough: “Because he’s a better player than you!”

Posted in Autobiography, Sport | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Israel’s Medieval Defence System

The Normans conquered England in 1066 and built castles to protect themselves. Their sophisticated castles were a brilliant, functional response to threats from a hostile population. Castles were successful until the civil wars of the 17th century.1 Cromwell’s New Model Army made them obsolete. The ‘impregnable’ Newark defensive system ended after a seven-month battle and walled defences disappeared in Britain.

Walls are a statement of national insecurity, which routinely fail. The Israelis have nonetheless ‘invested’ about $6bn in smart walls. Smart walls are walls with gizmos providing an illusion of safety.2 Walls display weakness when a threatened country has run out of ideas. Building them is an example of a tragic lack of imagination.

“Constantly ratcheting up militarised responses is counter-intuitive in managing endemic civil unrest. Israel’s internal security worsened after their [1967] military triumph. Building a ‘security’ wall is symbolic of this basic loss of control. The wall demonstrates policy failure by Israel.”3

 

The binary thinking of multiple Israeli governments ignores continuous technological innovation in warfare. America turbocharged drone weaponry after military casualties became politically inconvenient. Drones4 are their weapon of choice as war can waged without an American body-count. The world is entering an era of Robotic warfare, powered by AI, making faith in walls quixotic. Depersonalised miniturised warfare empties smart walls of meaning. Israel’s large drone manufacturing industry is based around surveillance with modifications for attack. They understand 21st century warfare but surprisingly persist in ‘smart wall’ strategies.

 

Walls, smart or not, are vulnerable.5 They’re inadequate as defence against external threats. The Gaza authorities launch 100s of homemade rockets in scattergun attacks on Israel. On May 11th 20236 they ineffectively launched 500 primitive rockets. If the attack had focused on the wall, their success might have been greater scoring a PR victory.

 

Israel’s government has been captured by the military alongside ideologically driven right-wing politicians. Consequently, they’re incapable of meaningful negotiations with the Palestinians, believing it’s a sign of weakness. This cycle of violence is entrenched and institutionalised, increasing Israel’s insecurity.

Notes

1 Tower of London – Wikipedia and see the 1646 battle of Newark The Third Siege of Newark, 1646 (bcw-project.org)

2 The Israeli’s have spent about $6bn on their defensive walls. Cost of border fences, underground barrier, reaches NIS 6bn (ynetnews.com) The French were equally deluded in the 1930s and spent an equivalent amount for their Maginot Line. Maginot Line – Wikipedia

3 Israel’s Disastrous ‘Six Day War’ 1967 | Odeboyz’s Blog (oedeboyz.com) See also The Gaza Strip and Israel, 2014 | Odeboyz’s Blog (oedeboyz.com)

4 List of drone strikes in Afghanistan – Wikipedia This is incomplete but is dauntingly long nonetheless. Obama’s murderous attacks on Pakistan are even worse. Drone strikes in Pakistan – Wikipedia

5 The Israeli’s wall on the West Bank, Gaza and Lebanon frontiers. The Golan Heights. Why is there a disputed border between Lebanon and Israel? | Border Disputes News | Al Jazeera

6 “Israel seized the Golan Heights in the 1967 Middle East war and annexed the 1,200-square-km (460-square-mile) territory in 1981, a move not recognised by most of the international community.” Israel hits Syria after rockets fired toward Golan Heights (cnbc.com) See also  Israel-Gaza: Hundreds of rockets fired at Israel amid deadly IDF airstrikes in Gaza | CNN

Posted in History, Politics, Technology, War | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment